Saturday, April 1, 2017

DC Comics Reborn


Last May, the DC Comics universe was reborn. Again. The most recent time when Batman & Co. had been reborn was in 2011, as part of the “New 52” initiative. However, the new timeline, initiated with the event called “Flashpoint”, indeed generated many nice story arcs, but it didn’t achieve the resurgence in comics’ sales that DC headquarters had hoped for. Therefore, the aim of breathing new life into the superheroes’ universe (and into that of potential new readers) may be seen as one of the reasons behind last year’s additional reboot.

Aside from considerations of a more practical nature, let’s see what has changed in terms of what matters to us: the stories and characters. Basically, the Rebirth initiative reties the pre-New 52 timeline and the present one, showing that the time split was not a consequence of Flash’s tampering with the past (as seen in Flashpoint) but actually the machinations of a certain character. So, with the magic touch and gimmicks of writer Geoff Johns, nothing is lost in the characters’ stories, and old and new friends can (re)begin their adventures anew. But then we have to consider, is Rebirth any good, or is it just a sterile attempt to renew the unrenewable, weakened under the emphasis of comic book publishers boosting movies aimed at a general audience? Well, it’s too early to say: for sure we haven’t seen the end of the plot bringing chaos into the superheroes’ worlds. But here’s what I think about the series I’ve come across so far.


DC Universe Rebirth. Geoff Johns (writer), various artists.
This is a must-read mini series serving as an introduction to the Rebirth event. It’s a must-read not primarily in terms of quality, but mainly because it sets the stage for the new universe, and it functions as a showcase of the predicaments of various heroes. Maybe even too much of a showcase: as an averagely-informed DC reader, I had trouble identifying all of the secondary characters and newer heroes in the pages, which occasionally turned out a bit confusing. However, in the end, one can make sense of what’s happening. Everyone’s favourite characters, such as Superman, Batman, the Flash, Wonder Woman, all take part in the rebirth. And the final revelation of who’s behind the temporal paradox is as unexpected as it is exciting. Of course, the showdown will take place a long way from here. All in all, a pretty nice, well-written and well-drawn (totally love Van Sciver) introduction. It’s still confusing in the beginning, but let’s face it: it’s good fun to see all of those characters with shiny new costumes start again.


Superman Vol. 1: Son of Superman. Peter J. Tomasi and Patrick Gleason (writers), various artists.
I can say upfront that this was the weakest of the few titles I read. I’m always torn about whether or not I should buy Superman titles. I like the characters and his mythology, but I am often disappointed with how the cycles end. I tend to find the last battles undermining. It happened with All Star Superman and Last Son of Krypton. It happened again here. The premise was interesting. Superman is living in the countryside with his wife Lois and their child Jon, who happens to have inherited his father’s powers (so Bryan Singer didn’t get it all wrong). While it is interesting to see how this new scenario of protecting family and the son coming to terms with the new powers he’s developing but can’t control, the final resolution does not quite deliver. The art gets the job done, without impressing me too much. The exception is Gleason’s old-fashioned style, which I found pleasing and in line with the overall out-of-time tone. Most of all, it also reminded me of the art in my beloved Red Son.

Batman Vol. 1: I am Gotham. Tom King (writer), David Finch (penciler).
Thank God they got Batman right. If the new beginning of Superman has its shortcomings, the new Batman has kicked off in a most promising way. I hadn’t read anything by Tom King (Scott Snyder, the main writer of New 52 Batman, is now in charge of All Star Batman), but judging from this first volume, I can say the caped crusader is in good hands. The story starts with an emotionally powerful moment of the dark knight, which made me almost shed a tear. Then, it introduces interesting characters for whom the reader can’t help but care in the end. Of course, there is no real ending to the whole saga. Something indeed happens in the end, but at the same time it sows seeds for Batman’s next adventures (as is wont) but also for something else entirely, which I can’t reveal here. We will see how that is played out in the next issues. I’m definitely getting vol. 2, which comes out next month. Which is more than I can say for Superman. Maybe Action Comics, with Dan Jurgens at the helm…

So that was the first batch of DC reviews. More to come in the future.

Alla prossima!

Fred

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

      Be still and just let me REMAKE you!




          It’s really no big news, as it has been out there for a while, but it struck me to read that now Disney is systematically planning to do live-action remakes of pretty much all its classic animated films. Well, remakes, re-imaginings, spin-offs... call them whatever you want. It was already in the air, as Disney has already produced Maleficent, Cinderella and now Beauty and the Beast, and people seemed to have enjoyed them. I do admit, I haven’t seen any of those, so I should just SHUT THE FRACK UP MAN, YOU DUNNO WHATCHA TALKING ABOUT! Yeah, yeah... Look, I just want to talk about this trend, this phenomenon, and I really don’t want to condemn any of these film or the ones that will come, as some will probably be good, if not excellent. It’s just that all this has me all puzzled!

          Let me be even broader: everyone seems to be doing remakes of everything! The remake of the cult anime Ghost in The Shell, Power Rangers (what?!), The Mummy, Death Note (expect a bitter post on that), The Matrix (SERIOUSLY?!) and so on. If you’d allow me (yes, you do allow me) to be even broader, producing follow-ups is even more popular than a remake: Trainspotting 2 (really didn’t see that coming), Blade Runner 2049 (smart title, but it’s Blade Runner 2, good luck with that), Fast and Furious I-have-lost-count. The list is truly endless. Moreover, there are even hybrids of the two! For example, as far as I know from rumors and trailers, Alien: Covenant could be a sort of Prometheus 2 (the character of David is there), Alien 5 (indeed, it is the fifth film with a xenomorph, and no, I don’t talk about Alien Vs Predators 1 and 2) or even a remake of Alien 3, as everyone seems to hate that movie (it’s imperfect for obvious reasons, but I quite like it). And what to make of Star Wars: The Force Awakens? Yeah, it’s a follow up in the series but... the sense of déjà vu during the viewing was very strong!

          And mentioning Star Wars opens a big can of sand worms: the big D has promised us a new SW film pretty much every year, alternating the ones belonging to the main saga and the spin-offs - like the good, but in the end useless - Rogue One (see, I liked that!). And now Disney owns Marvel, and Marvel Studios are putting out the staggering number of two big-budget films a year! And, obviously, Disney owns all of the classic films, and... go back and see the beginning of this post. It seems like it’s impossible to see an end to all this remaking, rebooting and sequeling (that’s a verb, trust me….).

          Is Disney the Empire of Dreams or the Evil Empire of Ready-Made Dreams? I wouldn’t be so drastic, as it is obvious that Disney is composed of many teams, which are each composed of many, many creative minds at work. So, I don’t think that creativity will be killed, even if those people will have to work inside defined boundaries. However, it does make me uncomfortable to think that just one company owns all of the franchises which which I grew up. If they really wanted to, there may be a chance for Disney to insert very specific values in their films and gently influence our lives... but enough about a Disney Conspiracy Theory!

          In conclusion to my first, rambling post on this blog (hi there!), let me write this: the trend described above is not a new thing. For example, Universal Studios did lots of sequels to its classic monster movies, rebooted some franchises and even did some horror comedies! Here, however, I’m talking about horror genre, which is kinda its own thing... damn, I’ll have to write another post on the genre! Anyway, the re-doing trend in film is an old thing and it’s stupid to say, “in the old days, everything was new”. Well, bullpoop (this is a safe for work blog). It has always been there. The problem nowadays is that a very high number of big budget films are remakes and the like, and their state-of-the-art marketing campaigns are always putting them on the spotlight. I also suspect that, due to the current economical situation, big companies want to play it safe, thus producing films that people are going to like for sure. But I really don’t know a thing about business and marketing, so I’ll just be quiet for now.

          One last thing: watch the ‘new’ re-made films with a critical eye and, if possible, enjoy them, but don’t forget the classics!

Ciao e a presto, vostro

Vinny Panini